Good afternoon and happy Sunday! ☕
Hope you're wrapping up your weekend on a high note. While you've been recharging, the tech world served up some absolute bangers this week. We've got billion-dollar drama between Nvidia and OpenAI, Elon channeling his inner Gilded Age robber baron, and yes—OnlyFans is shopping itself for $5.5 billion (you read that right).
Pour yourself that final cup of coffee and settle in. This one's fun.
Here are the 5 stories you need to know before you crush this week.
⏱️ Read time: 5 minutes
AI in HR? It’s happening now.
Deel's free 2026 trends report cuts through all the hype and lays out what HR teams can really expect in 2026. You’ll learn about the shifts happening now, the skill gaps you can't ignore, and resilience strategies that aren't just buzzwords. Plus you’ll get a practical toolkit that helps you implement it all without another costly and time-consuming transformation project.
📰 THIS WEEK'S TOP 5
🤝 Nvidia denies $100B OpenAI deal is dead: Jensen Huang calls WSJ report "nonsense"
🏛️ The rise of personal conglomerates: Elon Musk is building the next GE, except it's all him
🚗 Waymo raising $16B at $110B valuation: Google's robotaxi bet gets even bigger
🦄 5 new European unicorns in January alone: From Belgium to Ukraine, Europe's startup scene is heating up
💰 OnlyFans shopping $5.5B majority stake: The creator economy's cash cow wants out
1️⃣ NVIDIA CEO CALLS $100B OPENAI DRAMA "NONSENSE" (BUT IS IT?)
What happened: The Wall Street Journal dropped a Friday bomb claiming Nvidia was backing away from its $100 billion investment in OpenAI. Hours later, Jensen Huang publicly shot it down, saying Nvidia will "definitely participate" and called the report complete nonsense.

The details:
WSJ reported Nvidia was scaling back from $100B commitment to "tens of billions"
Claimed Jensen privately criticized OpenAI's strategy and praised competitors like Anthropic
Huang responded in Taipei: "We will invest a great deal of money. I believe in OpenAI."
OpenAI raising $100B round with Nvidia, Amazon, Microsoft, and SoftBank all in talks
Deal was always nonbinding—but now everyone's suddenly emphasizing that fact
Why it matters (Alberto's take): When the WSJ publishes "sources say Jensen is doubting OpenAI" and Jensen immediately flies to Taipei to publicly refute it, something's going on. Even if Nvidia does invest, the fact that everyone's clarifying it's a "nonbinding" deal tells you the power dynamic has shifted. Nvidia doesn't need OpenAI anymore—they're selling shovels to every gold miner in the AI rush. OpenAI, meanwhile, burns $5 billion a year and desperately needs that $100B. My bet? Nvidia invests, but at a fraction of the original number, and uses the leverage to extract better terms. When you're the only GPU supplier in town, you don't chase deals—you dictate them.
The bottom line: The world's two most important AI companies just had their first public spat. Even if they kiss and make up, the cracks are showing. Nvidia's realizing they don't need to bet on one horse when they own the racetrack.
2️⃣ BYE-BYE CORPORATE CONGLOMERATES. HELLO ELON MUSK INC.
What happened: Elon Musk isn't just running multiple companies anymore—he's reportedly merging some combination of SpaceX, Tesla, and xAI into one mega-conglomerate. Think GE, but instead of Jack Welch, it's one guy worth $800 billion calling all the shots.

The details:
Musk controls Tesla, SpaceX (+ Starlink), xAI, X (Twitter), Neuralink, and The Boring Company
Reports suggest he's exploring mergers between SpaceX, xAI, and Tesla
His net worth ($800B) rivals GE's peak market cap adjusted for inflation
Harvard professor: "This is much more robber baron than corporate conglomerate"
Unlike Gilded Age tycoons, Musk faces a regulatory environment—but it's being pulled back
Why it matters (Alberto's take): Elon's not building a company. He's building a personal empire that spans rockets, cars, AI, social media, brain chips, and tunnels. The comparison to John D. Rockefeller and J.P. Morgan isn't hyperbole—it's accurate. Here's the terrifying/fascinating part: conglomerates famously don't work (see: GE's spectacular collapse). But that's when you have shareholders, boards, and accountability. Musk has none of that. He IS the board. If he wants to funnel Tesla profits into xAI or use SpaceX rockets to launch Starlink satellites for Tesla cars, who's stopping him? The question isn't whether this creates conflicts of interest—it's whether anyone has the power to do anything about it. And right now? The answer is no.
The bottom line: We're witnessing the birth of the first true personal conglomerate in modern history. It's either going to be the smartest vertical integration play ever, or it's going to implode spectacularly when one part of the empire drags down the others. Place your bets.
3️⃣ WAYMO RAISING $16B AT $110B VALUATION (ALPHABET DOUBLES DOWN)
What happened: Waymo is closing a $16 billion funding round at a $110 billion valuation—more than double its $45 billion valuation from 2024. Alphabet (Google's parent company) is writing most of the check.

The details:
$16B round values Waymo at $110B (up from $45B in 2024)
Over 75% of funding comes from Alphabet (parent company putting skin in the game)
New investors: Dragoneer, Sequoia Capital, DST Global
Existing backers: a16z, Abu Dhabi's Mubadala
20+ million robotaxi rides completed, expanding to Miami
$350M+ in annual recurring revenue
Why it matters (Alberto's take): Alphabet just bet $12+ billion that robotaxis are the future of transportation. That's not a side bet—that's putting your kids' college fund on black. The valuation jump from $45B to $110B in 18 months is insane, but here's why it's justified: Waymo has an operational robotaxi service in multiple cities, 20 million completed rides, and growing revenue. Tesla still hasn't launched commercially. Cruise imploded. Zoox is stuck in development. Waymo won the race by simply... not exploding. The question now: can they scale fast enough to justify a $110 billion price tag, or did investors just buy the peak?
The bottom line: Alphabet looked at Waymo's burn rate, looked at the competitive landscape, and decided to write the biggest check in autonomous vehicle history. They're either geniuses or about to learn a very expensive lesson about robotaxi economics.
4️⃣ EUROPE'S UNICORN EXPLOSION: 5 IN JANUARY ALONE
What happened: January 2026 gave us five fresh European unicorns—from cybersecurity in Belgium to defense tech in France. Europe's startup scene is waking up.

The five new unicorns:
Aikido Security (Belgium) - $1B valuation, $60M Series B for cybersecurity platform
Cast AI (Lithuania/Florida) - $1B+ valuation for cloud/GPU optimization
Harmattan AI (France) - $1.4B valuation for autonomous defense aircraft (founded in 2024!)
Osapiens (Germany) - $1.1B valuation for ESG compliance software
Preply (Ukraine/US) - $1.2B valuation for AI-enhanced language learning marketplace
Why it matters (Alberto's take): Notice a pattern? Defense tech, cybersecurity, cloud infrastructure, compliance software. These aren't consumer apps or social networks—these are B2B, enterprise, mission-critical solutions that governments and corporations NEED. That's what makes them real businesses, not hype machines. The fact that a Ukrainian company (Preply) became a unicorn while their country is literally at war is next-level resilience. And Harmattan AI going from founding to $1.4B in under two years? Defense tech is the new AI gold rush. Smart money is following geopolitical risk, not consumer trends.
The bottom line: Europe isn't Silicon Valley, and that's becoming its superpower. While the U.S. pumps billions into the 47th AI coding assistant, Europe's building the infrastructure, compliance, and defense tech that actually moves needles.
5️⃣ ONLYFANS SHOPPING A $5.5B MAJORITY STAKE (YES, REALLY)
What happened: OnlyFans is in exclusive talks to sell a 60% stake to investment firm Architect Capital for $5.5 billion—$3.5B in equity, $2B in debt. The adult creator platform's billionaire owner wants to cash out.

The details:
Deal values OnlyFans at $5.5 billion total
Architect Capital taking 60% stake
Owner Leonid Radvinsky has been shopping the company since 2025
Previous talks with Forest Road Company fell through
OnlyFans insists it's "not a porn site" (narrator: it definitely is)
Platform has faced legal controversies over abusive content
Why it matters (Alberto's take): A platform where people sell adult content for subscription fees is worth $5.5 billion. Let that sink in. OnlyFans makes money hand over fist with minimal overhead—creators produce the content, OnlyFans takes 20%, and everyone's happy (except the banks who refuse to work with them). The fact that Radvinsky is selling now tells you he thinks the regulatory hammer is coming. Payment processors, app stores, and governments are circling. Smart move? Cash out at $5.5B before someone decides to deplatform you. Architect Capital is betting they can manage the regulatory risk and milk the cash cow. It's a fascinating case study in "controversial but profitable."
The bottom line: OnlyFans is the most successful creator economy platform you're not supposed to talk about at dinner parties. At $5.5 billion, it's worth more than most "legitimate" tech companies. The creator economy is real, it's massive, and it doesn't care about your moral opinions.
💭 ONE THING TO THINK ABOUT
This week showed us five different visions of the future:
Nvidia vs OpenAI: When your supplier is also your investor, who really has the power?
Elon's empire: Personal conglomerates replacing corporate ones
Waymo's $16B bet: Alphabet going all-in on robotaxis
Europe's unicorns: B2B infrastructure beats consumer hype
OnlyFans cash-out: The creator economy's dirty secret is worth billions
Here's the connecting thread: power is consolidating in ways we've never seen before.
One person (Elon) controlling aerospace, AI, EVs, and social media. One company (Alphabet) is betting $12B on robotaxis. One platform (OnlyFans) is capturing billions in creator economy revenue. One supplier (Nvidia) is dictating terms to the entire AI industry.
The future isn't decentralized. It's hyper-consolidated—just controlled by different players than before.
Question for you: If you could invest in ONE of these stories right now, Nvidia's AI dominance, Elon's personal empire, Waymo's robotaxi bet, European B2B tech, or the creator economy, which would you pick and why?
Hit reply. I read every single one.
📈 Want In?
Here's the deal: Founderscrowd Premium is normally $120/month, but we're still in beta pricing at $40/month.
For that, you get:
Weekly vetted investment opportunities (like SpaceX)
Full analyst reports and investment memos
Direct access to private market deals through our partnerships
A community of investors who actually get it

The SpaceX opportunity is live right now. But opportunities like this don't stick around forever, especially not with an IPO potentially six months away.
If you've ever felt like you're always one step behind the big money, this is how you change that.
Founderscrowd Premium gives you one fully analyzed investment opportunity every week, reviewed by our analysts and investment bankers.
Get access to pre-IPO companies, private market deals, and alternative investments most investors never see. $40/month (beta pricing, normally $120).
That's it for this week, friends.
Hope you have an amazing rest of your Sunday and an even better start to your week. Remember: the best investments happen before the crowds show up.
Keep building, keep investing, keep winning.
Alberto
Founder, Founderscrowd
P.S. This week was WILD. Nvidia-OpenAI drama, Elon building an empire, Waymo raising $16B, Europe cranking out unicorns, and OnlyFans cashing out for billions. If you're not paying attention to private markets right now, you're missing the entire game. Tuesday's deep dive breaks down why "personal conglomerates" like Musk's empire are going to reshape capitalism—and what it means for your portfolio.
💬 QUICK HITS (For Premium Members)
🚀 SpaceX filing for 1M satellite data centers — Space-based AI infrastructure coming soon
🤖 OpenAI's $100B round closing in February — Despite Nvidia drama, deal moving forward
💰 Stripe secondary shares trading at $120B — Up from $100B valuation last month
Disclaimer: The information provided in this newsletter is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. All news and data referenced reflects publicly available information and should not be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any securities. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and investing in startups and private companies involves significant risk, including the potential loss of principal. Readers should consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

