In partnership with
Good morning and happy Sunday! ☕
Hope you're having a relaxing weekend. While you've been recharging, the tech world has been anything but chill—Elon's suing for $134B, ChatGPT is getting ads, and a startup that started on Reddit just hit $120M in revenue.
Grab your coffee and settle in—here are the 5 stories that defined the week.
⏱️ Read time: 4 minutes
Hiring in 8 countries shouldn't require 8 different processes
This guide from Deel breaks down how to build one global hiring system. You’ll learn about assessment frameworks that scale, how to do headcount planning across regions, and even intake processes that work everywhere. As HR pros know, hiring in one country is hard enough. So let this free global hiring guide give you the tools you need to avoid global hiring headaches.
📰 IN TODAY'S TOP 5
💰 Musk wants $134B from OpenAI — Despite having $700B fortune, seeking massive damages in lawsuit
🚀 AI startup hits $120M ARR (started with Reddit post) — Runpod bootstrapped from basement mining rigs to major cloud player
📺 ChatGPT users getting targeted ads — OpenAI testing ads in free/Go tiers starting this week
🌍 Trump threatens 25% tariffs over Greenland — 8 European nations facing tariffs if Denmark won't sell
🎬 Disney dominated 2025 box office — Looking to repeat crown in 2026 with major releases
1️⃣ MUSK WANTS UP TO $134B IN OPENAI LAWSUIT (DESPITE $700B FORTUNE)
Founderscrowd's Take: Elon Musk is seeking jaw-dropping damages of $79B to $134B from OpenAI and Microsoft, claiming the AI company defrauded him by abandoning its nonprofit mission.
The details:
Musk's expert witness values his claim at $65.5B-$109.4B from OpenAI + $13.3B-$25.1B from Microsoft
Based on his $38M seed donation in 2015 when he co-founded OpenAI
That would mean a 3,500x return on his initial investment
The lawsuit heads to trial in Oakland, California in April 2026
The context that makes this wild:
Musk's current fortune: $700 billion (world's richest person)
He's $500B richer than Larry Page (world's #2 richest)
Tesla shareholders just approved a $1 trillion pay package for Musk (largest in history)
Even a $134B payout would be just 19% of his current wealth
Why it matters: This lawsuit isn't about the money—Musk could lose the entire $134B and still be the world's richest person by $500B. This is about principle and revenge. OpenAI started as a nonprofit to "ensure AGI benefits all of humanity." Then it pivoted to capped-profit, took billions from Microsoft, and is now valued at $500B while heading toward IPO. Musk feels betrayed by Sam Altman and the board. OpenAI calls this "an ongoing pattern of harassment." The trial in April will be Silicon Valley's most dramatic legal battle since Oracle v. Google.
The simple version: The world's richest man (worth $700B) is suing his former company for $134B, claiming they lied to him. He doesn't need the money—he just wants to prove he was right and Sam Altman was wrong. Silicon Valley billionaire drama at its finest.
2️⃣ AI CLOUD STARTUP RUNPOD HITS $120M ARR AND IT STARTED WITH A REDDIT POST
Founderscrowd's Take: Runpod, an AI app hosting platform, hit $120 million in annual recurring revenue just four years after launching. The origin story is one of the wildest in startup history: from basement Ethereum miners to Reddit post to $120M ARR.
The details:
2021: Zhen Lu and Pardeep Singh were Comcast developers mining Ethereum in their NJ basements
Early 2022: Ethereum mining dying, they pivoted to AI cloud hosting
Marketing strategy: "We didn't know how to market, so we just posted on Reddit"
2024: Bootstrapped to $1M+ revenue, then raised $20M seed (Dell + Intel) after VC saw their Reddit posts
2026: $120M ARR, 500,000 developers, Fortune 500 customers
The Reddit-to-riches playbook:
Posted in AI subreddits offering free GPU access for feedback
Never offered free tier—charged from day one to stay sustainable
Dell Technologies Capital VC saw their Reddit posts and reached out
Hugging Face co-founder used the product, loved it, became angel investor via support chat
Scaled to 100,000 developers → raised $20M → now at 500,000 developers
Why it matters: This destroys every "you need VC connections" myth. Two corporate devs with no startup experience, no network, no marketing budget—just built something developers wanted and posted about it on Reddit. That's it. Four years later: $120M ARR. The lesson? If you solve a real problem and tell the right community, distribution finds you. Also: bootstrapping works. They ran for two years without funding, forcing them to build a profitable business from day one. When VCs finally came calling, they had leverage.
The simple version: Two guys mining Ethereum in their basements saw crypto dying, pivoted to AI cloud hosting, posted about it on Reddit, and turned it into a $120 million revenue business in 4 years. No VC connections, no marketing budget, no MBA—just solving a problem developers had and telling them about it.
3️⃣ CHATGPT USERS ARE ABOUT TO GET HIT WITH TARGETED ADS
Founderscrowd's Take: OpenAI announced it will begin testing ads in ChatGPT for U.S. free and Go-tier users starting this week. The move marks a major shift for the company as it seeks revenue to offset its massive infrastructure costs.
The details:
Ads will appear at bottom of ChatGPT's answers, clearly labeled as "Sponsored"
Rolling out to free users and new $8/month "Go" tier (Plus/Pro/Enterprise remain ad-free)
OpenAI promises: answers won't be influenced by ads, data won't be sold to advertisers
Users can opt out of ad personalization
Won't show ads to users under 18 or for sensitive topics (health, politics)
The business case:
OpenAI has 800 million monthly users
Only 5% (~40M) pay for Plus or Pro subscriptions
Company needs revenue to offset $1.4 trillion infrastructure spending commitment over 8 years
Burning up to $115 billion in cash by 2030 (per investor documents)
The privacy concerns:
Ads will be "personalized" based on your conversations with ChatGPT
Example: Ask about trip planning → get hotel ads
Critics worry: people share intimate, personal info with ChatGPT
What happens when AI knows your health issues, relationship problems, financial situation?
Why it matters: This changes the internet again. Google built a $200B/year advertising empire by showing you ads based on what you search for. Now OpenAI will show you ads based on what you talk about with an AI that remembers everything you've ever told it. That's way more personal than search history. If done well, ads become genuinely helpful. If done poorly, it feels like surveillance capitalism on steroids. We'll find out which direction OpenAI goes.
The simple version: ChatGPT is getting ads. Free users will see them at the bottom of responses, targeted based on their conversations. OpenAI says it won't sell your data or let ads influence answers, but you're basically getting ads based on your most personal conversations with an AI. Google search ads on steroids—or surveillance nightmare. We'll see which.
📈 Want weekly access to private market deals usually reserved for the 1%?
Founderscrowd Premium gives you one fully analyzed investment opportunity every week, reviewed by our analysts and investment bankers. Get access to pre-IPO companies, private market deals, and alternative investments most investors never see.
$40/month (beta pricing, normally $120).
See you inside, let’s start 2026 right.
4️⃣ TRUMP THREATENS 25% TARIFFS ON 8 EUROPEAN NATIONS IF GREENLAND ISN'T SOLD
Founderscrowd's Take: President Trump announced that 8 European nations could face tariffs escalating to 25% if Denmark refuses to sell Greenland to the United States, marking one of the most unconventional foreign policy moves in modern history.
The details:
Trump wants to buy Greenland from Denmark
8 NATO allies (including Denmark) facing potential 25% tariffs if they don't negotiate
Denmark says Greenland is not for sale (it's a semi-autonomous territory, not Denmark's to sell)
Trump sees Greenland as strategically valuable: rare earth minerals, Arctic shipping routes, military positioning against China/Russia
Why this actually matters:
Rare earth minerals: Greenland has massive deposits of minerals critical for batteries, smartphones, military tech
Arctic trade routes: Climate change opening new shipping lanes through Arctic (cuts 40% off Asia-Europe routes)
Military positioning: Greenland is closer to Russia than Alaska
China is already there: China invested heavily in Greenland mining operations
The market implications:
If Trump succeeds: U.S. gains control of critical mineral supply chain (currently China-dominated)
If he fails: tariffs on European allies could disrupt NATO and trade
Either way: This signals resource nationalism is back
Why it matters: This isn't just Trump being Trump. This is geopolitics meeting resource scarcity. Greenland has rare earth minerals that power everything from iPhones to F-35 jets. China controls 70%+ of global rare earth supply. If the U.S. secures Greenland, it breaks China's monopoly. That's worth risking diplomatic relations with Denmark. For investors: rare earth mining companies, Arctic infrastructure plays, and defense contractors all benefit if this deal happens.
The simple version: Trump wants to buy Greenland from Denmark. Denmark says no. Trump threatens 25% tariffs on European allies if they won't negotiate. Why? Greenland has rare earth minerals critical for tech and military, plus valuable Arctic shipping routes. This is resource nationalism disguised as real estate deal.
5️⃣ DISNEY DOMINATED 2025 BOX OFFICE: HERE'S HOW IT COULD KEEP THE CROWN IN 26
Founderscrowd's Take: Disney crushed the 2025 box office with multiple billion-dollar films. Now the question is: can they repeat in 2026 with an even bigger slate of releases?
The 2025 domination:
Disney films generated over $4.5 billion in North American box office alone
Major wins: Thunderbolts, Captain America: Brave New World, Fantastic Four, Blade
Became the first studio to have 4 films cross $1B globally in a single year
The 2026 slate:
Avengers: Doomsday (May 2026) - expected $2B+ global
Avatar 3 (December 2026) - James Cameron's third installment
Multiple Pixar releases
Disney+ integration driving theatrical releases
Why it matters for investors:
Disney's theatrical success drives Disney+ subscriptions (see the Marvel/Star Wars flywheel)
Merchandising revenue from successful films dwarfs box office (Star Wars made $20B in toys vs. $10B in tickets)
Theme park attractions based on successful IPs drive long-term revenue (see: Pandora - World of Avatar)
The bigger picture: Streaming was supposed to kill theaters. It didn't. What it did was bifurcate: mid-tier films went straight to streaming, while blockbusters became bigger events. Disney owns the blockbuster category. That means: theatrical releases drive Disney+ subscriptions, merchandise sales, theme park expansions, and licensing deals. It's a flywheel. When Disney wins at theaters, they win everywhere.
The simple version: Disney had 4 films make over $1 billion in 2025. They're loading up for 2026 with Avengers and Avatar 3. When Disney dominates theaters, it powers their entire business—Disney+, merchandise, theme parks, licensing. The flywheel keeps spinning.
💬 ONE MORE THING
A thought for your Sunday:
This week showed us five different paths to building something that matters:
Elon's path: Co-found a company, feel betrayed, sue for $134B (even though you're worth $700B)
Runpod's path: Mine Ethereum in your basement, pivot to AI, post on Reddit, scale to $120M ARR
OpenAI's path: Raise billions, burn billions, bet everything on AI, monetize through ads when you run out of cash
Trump's path: Want something? Threaten tariffs until you get it (or don't)
Disney's path: Make massive bets on IP, create flywheels that print money forever
Five wildly different strategies. All working. All controversial. All reshaping their industries.
The lesson? There's no one path to building wealth or power. The only requirement is conviction—and the willingness to look ridiculous until you're proven right.
Question for you: Which of these five strategies resonates most with you? The bootstrapped builder (Runpod), the billionaire with a grudge (Musk), the bet-the-company play (OpenAI), the dealmaker (Trump), or the IP empire (Disney)? Hit reply and let us know.
That's it for this week.
Enjoy the rest of your Sunday, and we'll see you Tuesday with our deep dive into why Reddit-to-riches stories like Runpod are becoming more common—and how platforms like Founderscrowd are making similar opportunities accessible to everyone.
Have a great week ahead,
The Founderscrowd Team
P.S. Runpod went from a Reddit post to $120M ARR in 4 years. No VC connections, no marketing budget, no fancy degrees—just solving a real problem and telling the right community. That's the power of building in public. Tuesday's newsletter will break down the "community-first" startup playbook and why it's replacing the traditional VC model.
Disclaimer: The information provided in this newsletter is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. All news and data referenced reflects publicly available information and should not be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any securities. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and investing in startups and private companies involves significant risk, including the potential loss of principal. Readers should consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
💬 QUICK HITS
🚀 SpaceX secondary shares reportedly trading at $350B valuation — Up from $255B in June 2025. Demand remains insane. More here [For premium members]
🤖 Anthropic reportedly in talks for Series G at $200B+ — Just 4 months after $183B Series F. AI lab valuations showing no signs of slowing. More here [For premium members]
💰 Databricks extends secondary window through Jan 15 — Last chance to buy at $62B before likely IPO in Q2 2026. More here [For premium members]