In partnership with

Good morning and happy Saturday! ☕

Hope you're having a great weekend. While you've been recharging, the world's been busy, Tesla just went full sci-fi in Austin, Netflix is playing Monopoly with Warner Bros, and Sequoia broke one of Silicon Valley's oldest unwritten rules.

Grab your coffee and settle in.

Here are the 5 stories that defined the week.

⏱️ Read time: 4 minutes

AI in HR? It’s happening now.

Deel's free 2026 trends report cuts through all the hype and lays out what HR teams can really expect in 2026. You’ll learn about the shifts happening now, the skill gaps you can't ignore, and resilience strategies that aren't just buzzwords. Plus you’ll get a practical toolkit that helps you implement it all without another costly and time-consuming transformation project.

📰 IN TODAY'S TOP 5

🚗 Tesla launches driverless robotaxis in Austin — No safety drivers, no steering wheels, just AI behind the wheel

📺 Substack launches TV app — Coming for YouTube and Patreon's creator economy throne

💰 Sequoia invests in Anthropic (while backing OpenAI) — Breaking VC's biggest taboo: never back rivals

🎬 Netflix offers all cash for Warner Bros — $82.7B bid to fend off Paramount in streaming wars

🤖 DAVOS: AI leaders say disruption is happening faster than expected — 6-12 months until AI does "most" software engineering

1️⃣ TESLA LAUNCHES ROBOTAXI RIDES IN AUSTIN WITH NO HUMAN SAFETY DRIVER

Founderscrowd's Take: Tesla just flipped the switch on fully autonomous robotaxis in Austin, Texas—no safety driver, no human backup, just you and the AI.

The details:

  • Tesla's AI lead Ashok Elluswamy confirmed they're "starting with a few unsupervised vehicles"

  • Most of the fleet still has safety monitors, but the ratio of driverless cars will increase over time

  • This is Tesla's first fully autonomous commercial service in the US

  • Austin residents can now order a ride that shows up with zero humans inside

Why it matters: Remember when Cruise and Waymo had safety drivers for years before going full autonomous? Tesla just said "hold my beer" and went straight to no-driver mode. This is either brilliant confidence or terrifying hubris, depending on who you ask. The reality? If Tesla can pull this off without incidents, every other autonomous vehicle company just got lapped. And if there's a major accident? The entire autonomous vehicle industry takes a regulatory hit. High stakes, high reward. Classic Elon.

The simple version: You can now order a Tesla in Austin and a car will show up with nobody inside. Either we're living in the future, or we're all beta testers for Skynet. Probably both.

2️⃣ SUBSTACK LAUNCHES A TV APP
(COMING FOR YOUTUBE'S CROWN)

Founderscrowd's Take: Substack just launched a TV app for streaming video and livestreams, making a direct play for YouTube and Patreon's creator economy dominance.

The details:

  • The app lets creators stream video content and host livestreams directly to subscribers

  • Substack has been investing heavily in video infrastructure

  • They're positioning as the "everything platform" for creators: writing, video, podcasts, payments

  • Competing directly with YouTube for long-form video and Patreon for creator monetization

Why it matters: Here's the uncomfortable truth for YouTube: their business model is showing ads to viewers and giving creators 55% of ad revenue. Substack's model is simpler: creators charge subscribers directly, Substack takes 10%. No ads, no algorithm manipulation, no demonetization drama. If Substack can crack distribution (YouTube's moat), they could steal the creator economy's top tier—the people making enough money to not care about algorithmic reach. YouTube's nightmare scenario: MrBeast launches on Substack and brings 460 million subscribers with him.

The simple version: Substack wants to be Netflix + Patreon + Medium all in one. Creators get paid directly by fans, no ads, no algorithm games. If it works, YouTube has a problem.

3️⃣ SEQUOIA TO INVEST IN ANTHROPIC, BREAKING VC TABOO ON BACKING RIVALS

Founderscrowd's Take: Sequoia Capital is joining Anthropic's massive funding round—despite already backing OpenAI. That's like betting on both the Yankees and the Red Sox in the World Series.

The details:

  • Sequoia has historically backed OpenAI (Sam Altman's company)

  • Now they're investing in Anthropic (OpenAI's biggest competitor)

  • VCs have traditionally avoided backing competing companies in the same sector

  • The move signals that AI is so big, even top VCs want exposure to multiple horses

Why it matters: This is either genius diversification or a massive conflict of interest, depending on your perspective. The bull case: AI is so massive ($10-15T market by 2030) that Sequoia wants exposure to both leaders. The bear case: how do you help both companies strategically when they're directly competing for talent, customers, and market share? The reality: Sequoia probably knows one of them will win the AI race, and they're hedging their bets. Smart money doesn't pick one horse when the prize is measured in trillions.

The simple version: The top VC firm in Silicon Valley just bet on both OpenAI AND its biggest rival. Either AI is so massive that even competitors can coexist, or Sequoia is playing both sides to guarantee a winner. Probably both.

📈 Want weekly access to private market deals usually reserved for the 1%?

Founderscrowd Premium gives you one fully analyzed investment opportunity every week, reviewed by our analysts and investment bankers. Get access to pre-IPO companies, private market deals, and alternative investments most investors never see.
$40/month (beta pricing, normally $120).

See you on the other side.

4️⃣ NETFLIX REVISES OFFER TO PAY ALL CASH FOR WARNER BROS (FENDING OFF PARAMOUNT)

Founderscrowd's Take: Netflix just revised its $82.7 billion bid for Warner Bros Discovery to all cash, trying to lock down the deal before Paramount can counter-offer.

The details:

  • Netflix maintaining $27.75 per share offer (same price, just all cash now)

  • Total deal valued at $82.7 billion for WBD's movie studio and streaming assets

  • Paramount previously tried to outbid Netflix with a stock-heavy offer

  • All-cash offer removes uncertainty and sweetens the deal for WBD shareholders

Why it matters: This is endgame stuff for streaming. Netflix spent years fighting Disney, Amazon, Apple—now they're just buying the competition. If this goes through, Netflix owns: Warner Bros movie studio (Batman, Harry Potter, DC Comics), HBO Max content library, CNN, and Discovery's reality TV empire. That's not a streaming service anymore—that's a media empire. The play: consolidate content ownership before AI-generated content floods the market and makes traditional studios obsolete. Whoever owns the IP libraries when AI can generate infinite content wins.

The simple version: Netflix is dropping $82.7 billion in cash to buy Warner Bros before someone else does. If it works, they go from "streaming company" to "media empire that happens to stream." Monopoly money meets actual Monopoly.

5️⃣ DAVOS: AI LEADERS SAY DISRUPTION IS HAPPENING FASTER THAN EXPECTED

Founderscrowd's Take: The World Economic Forum in Davos turned into an AI panic session this week, with industry leaders warning that disruption is accelerating faster than anyone predicted.

The details:

  • Anthropic's Dario Amodei: Called Trump's AI chip sales to China like "selling nuclear weapons to North Korea"

  • Google's Demis Hassabis: Predicted AI-driven slowdowns in junior hiring this year, but long-term skill creation

  • Microsoft's Satya Nadella: "No company can just coast in the AI era—big companies that don't keep up will get schooled by someone small"

  • Amodei's bombshell: We may be 6-12 months away from AI doing "most, maybe all" of what software engineers do end-to-end

Why it matters: Six to twelve months until AI can do full software engineering. Read that again. That's not "AI will help developers code faster." That's "AI will replace developers entirely." If Amodei is right (and he's been scarily accurate on AI timelines), we're about to see the first mass white-collar job displacement in history. Not factory workers. Not truck drivers. Software engineers—the people making $200K-$400K at tech companies. The adaptation window isn't 5 years. It's 6-12 months. If you're in tech and not actively learning how to work with AI (or pivot to something AI can't do), you're already behind.

The simple version: AI leaders at Davos said the quiet part out loud: AI will do most software engineering within 6-12 months, junior hiring is slowing, and big companies that don't adapt will get "schooled by someone small." The future just got a lot closer.💰 THIS WEEK'S FUNDING HIGHLIGHTS

💬 ONE MORE THING

A thought for your Saturday:

This week showed us five different futures colliding at once:

Tesla: A world where cars drive themselves and humans are passengers
Substack: A world where creators own their audience and platforms take 10%, not 55%
Sequoia: A world so big that even competitors can coexist (or VCs are hedging bets)
Netflix: A world where streaming wars end in consolidation, not competition
Davos AI panic: A world where software engineers are replaced in 6-12 months

Five futures. All happening simultaneously. All requiring you to adapt RIGHT NOW.

The people who win in 2026 won't be the ones who saw it coming. They'll be the ones who moved before everyone else figured it out.

Question for you: If AI can do most software engineering in 6-12 months, what's your plan? Learn to work WITH AI? Pivot to something AI can't do? Double down on skills AI won't replace? Hit reply and let us know—we're genuinely curious how our community is thinking about this.

That's it for this week.

Enjoy the rest of your Saturday, and we'll see you Tuesday with our deep dive into why Sequoia betting on both OpenAI and Anthropic isn't crazy—it's the smartest move in venture capital.

Have a great weekend,
The Founderscrowd Team

P.S. The Davos AI warnings weren't abstract. Amodei gave a 6-12-month timeline for AI to do full software engineering. That's two to four quarters. If you're building a career in tech, the question isn't "will AI affect me?" It's "What am I doing in the next 6 months to stay relevant?" Tuesday's newsletter will break down the three categories of AI-proof careers and why "AI-resistant" beats "AI-powered" long-term.

Disclaimer: The information provided in this newsletter is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. All news and data referenced reflects publicly available information and should not be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any securities. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and investing in startups and private companies involves significant risk, including the potential loss of principal. Readers should consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

💬 QUICK HITS

🚀 SpaceX secondary shares reportedly trading at $350B valuation — Up from $255B in June 2025. Demand remains insane. More here [For premium members]

🤖 Anthropic reportedly in talks for Series G at $200B+ — Just 4 months after $183B Series F. AI lab valuations showing no signs of slowing. More here [For premium members]

💰 Databricks extends secondary window through Jan 15 — Last chance to buy at $62B before likely IPO in Q2 2026. More here [For premium members]

Recommended for you